Comments on: De Castro-Backed Liga ng mga Barangay Prexy Disqualified

By: attybenji

attybenji — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 06:34:02 +0000

Mrsrs. Panelo & Silangan:
Bilang sayo tabi na observer san pulitika sa Bulan, an “humble opinion” ko lang tabi manunungod sine na sinasabi san kampo ni kapitan Vytiaco (per your column “De Castro-Backed Liga ng mga Barangay Prexy Disqualified”) na an “BP Blg. 22 (otherwise known as Anti-Bouncing Checks Law) kuno ay na “decriminalized” na base sa mga decisions san Korte Suprema, so it means based on their argument a “conviction for violation of BP blg. 22 should no longer be considered a crime involving moral turpitude, kay na “decriminalized” na kuno ine, an pakasabot ko tabi sine an BP Blg 22, deri pa man yun “na-decriminalized”… kaya baga san sala an pakasabot nira sun na BP 22… Ipinaliwanag na tabi yun san korte suprema san nagkariribok an mga RTC/MTC Judges sa metro manila. Kaya ngani nagkasiribot na nagpalabas sin magkasunod na circular an korte suprema, re, Circular No. 12-2000, xxx deleting the penalty of imprisonment in conviction for violation of BP Blg 22, per decision rendered in the cases of Eduardo Vaca v. Court of Appeal, G.R. No. 131714 (Nov. 16, 1998) and Rosa Lim v. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 130038 (Sept. 18, 2000), the Supreme Court speaking thru then Justice Vicente Mendoza modified the sentence imposed for violation of BP 22, and imposing only of fine in an amount double the amount of check or checks. xxx

xxx To further clarify the matter, the SC issued another Circular 13-2001, it said that administrative circular does not remove imprisonment as an alternative penalty for violation of BP blg. 22. xxx

.xxx Should only a fine be imposed and the accused be unable to pay the fine, there is no legal obstacle to the application of the Revised Penal Code provision on subsidiary imprisonment. xxx

So, klarado baga tabi na kapag may penalty of imprisonment… ine ay nangangahulugan na kriminal pa an kaso, kun wara na an sentencia san pagkapreso deri na tabi yun kriminal, o posible sibil na lang an kaso o multa nalang. Kaya po maliwanag pa sa adlaw na deri pa man “na-decriminalized” an BP blg 22, so under the settled jurisprudence, conviction for violation of BP blg 22 would still fall under the category of a crime involving moral turpitude…

By analogy tabi, kun sayo sa mga disqualifications sa pagka-President sa Liga ng mga Barangay ay sinasabi na…. “He/She must not have been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude”, then by mere conviction alone (meaning the sentenced has become final already), said candidate is disqualified na….. if the allegations raised by Kapitans Evasco, Bongcan and Loilo in their complaints were true, then there is no doubt that Vytiaco is disqualified to occupy the post of the President ng Liga ng mga Barangay… Tapos na an boxing… (dati tabi an gahoy sine sa old local code “Association of Barangay Captains” kaya an presidente, an gahoy ABC President)……. Kilala ko ine si Evasco mao ni Boncan mga maprinsipio ine na tawo…sadto pa man lumalaban na ine kan ex-meyor guiming…..

Sugad lang sun ka simple yun.. para wara na sin daghan na mga debate…. an batas naman nato is more of a common sense lang po….. one should not be a lawyer or a judge to be able to interpret or understand the language of the law..
Deri mao tabi mga tagaBulan?

Mabuhay ka, Mr Panelo & Mr. Silangan……

By: Tagabulan

Tagabulan — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:41:55 +0000

shrenka hello. good to be reminded re: toto vytiaco. im just wonderin why he is always mentioned on air (radio 1fm) as ABC president? was he not disqualified for this election coz of gruesome pending case against him? what happened to his disqualification case by d way? what a race to beat!

By: shrenka

shrenka — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:24:52 +0000

to toto vytiaco,
matanOs kaY yaDto kn s paraiso pumunta kp s ImpyiernO!!!!sO pLitaN n nTin aNg paRaiso nG …….u kNoW!!……gOsHHHHH!!!!! pRanG maiNit duN ahh!!!!

By: shrenka

shrenka — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:21:31 +0000

TO KABATAS,
pede tabi paghapOt aNo n Po an mangyAyari kaN toto vytiaco?

By: Sadonna

Sadonna — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:48:27 +0000

TO Annika Guelas

I symphatized with u. Sayang ka you are stiil too young. U were merely used politically by Geming de Castro through ur uncaring and ambitious father. Is he ur biological father, ha!.? Just asking because this is not the works of a good and responsible father. Again beware of Geming…bad karma carrier.

By: Sadonna

Sadonna — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:39:03 +0000

TO Toto Vytiaco

Bad karma for u. Tay agad nakawala ka na sa lado ni Geming bumalik ka giraray. Hanap mo pa an sakit sin ulo. Nano niyan an pamati mo. Beware of Geming minamalas na siya. Bad karma baga gihapon an gahoy sini.

By: Boying

Boying — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:38:24 +0000

olol sa sa ingud ko na lang an terminal, sayang man san 80milyones..money money baga buknoy..

By: buknoy

buknoy — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:43:30 +0000

hello salve. nakay dire mo ibutang sa balay nio an terminal, kay hahalian mo pa kami na kabataan san masasayawsayawan. puera lang kun magpadisco k man s iyo….nano daw?

By: salve

salve — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:11:47 +0000

WARA DAW DIDI NAGKOKOMENTARYO. MR VYTIACO AN PARAISO
MAGAYON MAN BAGA. PWEDENG BUS TERMINAL, jokejokejoke